Officials Confirm: You Didn’t See What You Saw. Noem and Vance Rewrite Reality.
- Dani Lemonade

- Jan 9
- 2 min read

When officials say the video is misleading, protests become the story, and cameras become the threat.
What Kristi Noem and JD Vance are saying:
"The video of the shooting does not show what it shows."
According to Noem, the agents were merely trying to free their car from being stuck in the snow when they were attacked by Renee Good.
.A claim that is bold, imaginative, and completely unsupported by the footage.
The car is not stuck. No one is attacking it.
A person is shot anyway.
But please stop noticing that. You’re being unreasonable.
The Video Is Lying (But Trust Us)
This is the new talking point. Not denial. Not correction.Reinterpretation.
You saw a shooting.They saw “context.”And only one of those is apparently allowed to exist.
The problem, we are told, is that the public keeps watching raw footage instead of waiting for officials to explain what they meant to do. This is a media literacy failure. On your part.
Reality, after all, is famously unreliable without a spokesperson.
Enter the Snowballs, Stage Right
The snowballs come later. After the shooting. At the ICE compound. During protests.
And here’s where the narrative gymnastics get interesting.
The snowballs are not blamed for the shooting.They are blamed for the response to the outrage about the shooting.
See the move?
A person is killed
Video circulates
People protest
Protesters throw snowballs
ICE responds with pepper spray bombs
Focus shifts entirely to “violent protesters”
The shooting fades into the background like an inconvenient pop-up ad.
Pepper spray grenades vs snowballs is framed as “law enforcement under siege,” not escalation.
Because once the spotlight moves, the original act no longer needs explaining.
The Real Escalation: Cameras
And now, the pièce de résistance.
Officials are floating restrictions on filming ICE agents.
Not because filming caused violence.
Not because it endangered anyone.
But because it made the narrative harder to control.
When the state says “don’t record us,” it’s not asking for safety. It’s asking for silence.
This isn’t about snowballs. It’s not about cars. It’s not even about protests.
It’s about who gets to define reality when the evidence is inconvenient.
Final Clarification, Since We’re Doing That Now
The video is clear.The claims are not. And the sudden urge to ban filming tells you everything you need to know about which one scares them more.
If the footage backed their story, they’d replay it on loop.


Comments